Assesses AI governance and usage, inspired by ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act.
Click an answer to see what a Kaliteq assessment feels like. Nothing is ever saved here.
À quel stade se situe globalement l'usage de l'IA dans votre organisation ?
Votre organisation dispose-t-elle d'une vision IA formalisée et communiquée ?
La stratégie IA est-elle explicitement alignée avec les objectifs stratégiques de l'entreprise ?
Disposez-vous d'une feuille de route IA formalisée avec des priorités claires ?
Another 100 questions await you
This is only a preview of the diagnostic
Continue to discover all the questions and get your personalized analysis.
Start my free trial15+ diagnostics available · 1000+ maturity questions · AI built in
Assesses AI governance and usage, inspired by ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act.
Objective : Évaluer la gouvernance et les usages de l'IA dans mon organisation.
An AI governance diagnostic assesses how an organization oversees the design, deployment and supervision of its artificial intelligence uses, whether internal tools (conversational assistants, automation) or systems embedded in products. Unlike a technical model audit (bias testing, robustness), this diagnostic focuses on governance: who decides, who supervises, how risks are identified and treated, and how uses are documented.
The EU AI Act, coming into force in stages since 2024, along with frameworks like ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI RMF, now shape expectations around AI governance. Few organizations, particularly SMEs and mid-sized companies, currently have a clear view of their own maturity on this topic: this diagnostic objectively measures the gap against these frameworks, without aiming for immediate certification, to prioritize the most urgent actions.
A clear view of your actual AI uses
Map the AI uses across your organization, including the ones that often fly under the IT department's radar (AI tools adopted spontaneously by teams).
An assessment of your AI Act exposure
Identify whether your AI uses fall into a risk category regulated by the EU AI Act, and the level of obligations that follow.
Structured governance without bureaucratic overkill
Get recommendations sized to your organization, without aiming for a governance setup disproportionate for an SME.
A base for your internal AI policy
The diagnostic's findings and recommendations feed directly into drafting or updating your AI usage policy.
An approach aligned with recognized frameworks
The diagnostic draws on ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the AI Act, to stay consistent with current expectations from clients, investors and regulators.
A diagnostic designed to be run without prior expertise, though each profile draws different value from it.
Executive / Management
Measures the company's exposure to AI-related risks and obligations, to arbitrate priorities without relying on technical jargon.
CIO / CTO
Structures the technical governance of AI (data access, model oversight, vendor dependency) beyond mere tool choices.
Innovation / Digital transformation lead
Objectively assesses the organization's AI maturity before launching new use cases, to avoid stacking tools without a governance framework.
CISO
Assesses AI-specific security and confidentiality risks (data leaks through third-party tools, dependency on a single vendor).
Legal / Compliance lead
Anticipates AI Act obligations and documents high-risk uses, ahead of an audit or a due diligence.
Each domain is made up of factual questions, with no unnecessary jargon.
IA & Gouvernance des Modèles
Usage de l'IA, gouvernance des modèles, risques réglementaires et politiques internes
Data & IA Engineering
Architecture data, qualité des pipelines, gouvernance des données et MLOps
The AI Diagnostic is inspired by ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act — without claiming official conformity to these frameworks, which remain the only recognized certification path.
A map of AI uses and risks
A per-domain summary (governance, data, security) of identified uses and their risk level.
A position against the AI Act
An estimate of the level of obligations applicable to your AI uses, based on the risk categories defined by the EU regulation.
Prioritized recommendations
Concrete actions to structure AI governance, ranked by urgency and implementation effort.
A Progress Plan tracked over time
Every recommendation becomes a tracked action with a status and a comment, to steer the organization's progressive compliance.
Start this diagnostic now and get your first recommendations after just a few questions.
Start my free trialNo. It is a self-assessment that positions your AI uses against the AI Act's risk categories, with no official certification value. It objectively measures your level of readiness and helps prioritize actions, ahead of formal legal advice if needed.
Yes. The use of consumer conversational assistants by teams, often outside any formal framework, is part of what is assessed: access governance, awareness, and handling of sensitive data shared with third-party tools.
No. The vast majority of organizations concerned use third-party AI tools (assistants, automation, tools embedded in their business software) rather than building their own models. The diagnostic is designed for both cases, with most questions applicable as soon as an AI tool is used within the organization.
ISO/IEC 42001 is a certifiable standard, audited by an accredited body, that defines an AI management system. The Kaliteq diagnostic draws on it to structure its assessment, without issuing a certification: it objectively measures the gap with the standard and, if the company wishes, prepares for a later certification process.
Yes, this is in fact the profile that gets the most value from it: it sets a governance framework from the very first uses, rather than having to catch up once AI is already widely deployed without oversight.
The AI Diagnostic includes around 104 questions across 2 domains, roughly 52 to 83 minutes for a first pass. Answers remain editable as long as the diagnostic has not been finalized.
The AI Diagnostic covers the following domains: IA & Gouvernance des Modèles, Data & IA Engineering.
Typically, management answers the governance-related questions, while operational leads answer the questions in their domain (e.g. CISO or IT director for cybersecurity, CTO for development). Kaliteq lets you invite several contributors on the same diagnostic, each answering the domains that concern them.
The AI Diagnostic is inspired by ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act — without claiming official conformity to these frameworks, which remain the only recognized certification path.
At the end of the diagnostic, Kaliteq generates a report structured by domain: maturity level, identified strengths, risks prioritized by impact and remediation effort, and recommendations automatically turned into a tracked Progress Plan. The report is based exclusively on the answers provided and any associated documents, with full traceability to their source.
Yes. The AI Diagnostic is rated "avance" difficulty. Its advanced level covers more technical topics; it is best completed with input from an operational lead in the domain (CISO, CTO, IT director…). Kaliteq is designed for organizations of any size, with no dedicated team required to run the diagnostic.
Adaptive questionnaires, intelligent Data Room, Smart Hub RAG engine and automated reports: discover the tools shared by every Kaliteq diagnostic.
Discover Kaliteq's solutions